Forest
governance can be defined as the whole of public and private interactions which
design, implement and oversee policies, laws and regulations relating to the
allocation, use and trade of forest resources. This process includes a lot of
actors from statutory and customary government, the private sector and civil
society, which are operating at different levels of scale. It is also referred
to as interactive governance.
There
are different styles or modes of governance, with the most important ones in
Ghana
being:
·
Hierarchical governance –
a
top-down style of interaction between the State and its citizens. The key
concepts involved are steering, planning and control, as expressed in laws and policies.
This mode, a legacy of British colonial rule, is widespread, with the Forestry Commission
(FC) being the main responsible agency for forest management.
·
Co-governance –
a collaborative way of governing in which responsibilities are shared between
the State and societal parties with a common purpose in mind. It is characterized
by horizontal relationships, with no actor being solely in control.
Eventhough
the Forestry Commission (FC) of Ghana used to be more inclined towards
Hierarchical governance, Several co-governance arrangements are found in the
1994 Forest and Wildlife Policy and its legislative instruments, especially the
provisions and guiding principles relating to community forestry, collaborative
resource management and participatory forest management. A noticeable example
was the setting up of the Community Biodiversity Advisory Groups (CBAGs) by FC
to support the management of the Globally Significant Biodiversity Areas
(GSBAs) in the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment